SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 9050

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
RAMIAH SAMBANDAM – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY CYBER CRIME PS – Respondent


CAV ORDER

Both these petitions call in question a solitary charge sheet filed in a criminal case in C.C.No.7576 of 2024 pending before the XLV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru. Criminal Petition No.6295 of 2024 is preferred by accused Nos. 2, 4, 5 and 9 and Criminal Petition No.6306 of 2024 is preferred by accused Nos. 1, 7 and 8. Since both these petitions arise out of a common criminal case, they are considered together in this common order. For the sake of convenience facts in Criminal Petition No.6295 of 2024 are noticed.

2. Facts, in brief, germane are as follows:

Respondents 2 and 3 are the complainants. The petitioners are accused who are erstwhile employees of respondents 2 and 3. In the later part of 2016 a huge organizational change within the groups of multi-national companies is said to have happened in the industry. The petitioners, as observed hereinabove, all employees of M/s Silicomp India Private Limited (‘the Company’ for short) which was earlier known as FIME India, a subsidiary of FIME SAS, France Company. The averment in the petition is that due to hostile atmosphere, the 1st petitioner/accused No.4 was constrained to resign. He was relieved

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top