SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 9060

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
TECH STEEL PRODUCTS LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
GHOUSIA FOOD PRODUCTS PVT LTD – Respondent


ORAL ORDER

In these petitions filed under Section 397 r/w 401 Cr.P.C , petitioners who are complainants before the trial Court, have challenged the judgment and order passed by the Sessions Court, whereby it allowed the appeals filed by the accused, challenging his conviction and sentence for the offence punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act (for short 'N.I Act') and remanded all the complaints to the trial Court with a direction to decide the same in accordance with law.

2. For the sake of convenience, parties are referred to by their ranks before the trial Court.

3. In all this petitions, complainant and accused are common and the case put forth by the complainant and the defence taken by the accused is common. Therefore, these cases are clubbed together and disposed of by a common order.

4. Complainant, which is a company represented by it's Director filed 5 separate complaints against the accused represented by its authorised signatory, alleging offence punishable under Section 138 of N.I Act.

5. In Crl.RP.Nos.228/2025, 230/2025 and 231/2025, it is contended by the complainant that towards repayment of loan of ₹1,00,00,000/- each taken by the accused company

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top