SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 9083

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Appellant
Versus
SIDDALINGAPPA – Respondent


CAV JUDGMENT

(PER: HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA)

The regular first appeals arise from the judgment and decree dated 23.07.2010 passed in OS No.7/2008 by the Civil Judge (Sr. Dn.) and JMFC, Soraba, (hereinafter referred to as ‘trial Court’ for short), whereby the plaintiff’s suit seeking compensation and alternatively for declaration of ownership and possession over the suit schedule property was decreed.

2. RFA 137/2011 is preferred by the State- (defendants No.1 to 3) and RFA 406/2011 is preferred by defendant No.4, the Town Municipal Council, Shikaripura, (TMC for short).

3. On 01.03.1941 TMC passed a resolution to form and distribute sites in Sy.No.6. On 08.08.1941 TMC passed a resolution to acquire Sy. No.6 (suit properties are shown as Sy. Nos.6/1 and 6/2). On 30.12.1941 TMC passed a resolution and resolved that Rs.2,106/- must be deposited for the land acquisition as per LA C:10/41-42. On 11.10.1945, a final notification was issued by the State under Section 6 (1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (‘ LA Act’ for short). Chittur Siddappa’s sons i.e., Honnappa and Siddabasappa effected oral partition on 24.09.1934. The oral partition was reduced in writing on 15.02.1949. Unde

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top