SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 9136

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
M/S METRO STEEL SECTION – Appellant
Versus
THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER – Respondent


CAV ORDER

The petitioners are before this Court seeking quashing of notices issued on 14-12-2023, 12-03-2024 and 18-03-2024 by respondent invoking the provisions of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’ for short).

2. Heard Sri R.S.Rajesh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Smt. Sadhana Desai, learned counsel appearing for the respondent.

3. Facts, in brief, germane are as follows:-

The 1st petitioner is a partnership firm constituted by the 2nd petitioner along with his wife and mother, petitioners 3 and 4. For the sake of convenience in this order all the petitioners would be referred to as the petitioner/firm/unit. The office of the petitioner was in Bangalore. The firm was said to have been registered under the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (‘MSMED Act’ for short) and the firm was eligible for all Government schemes in terms of notifications issued from time to time by the Ministry of Finance concerning benefits, obligations and liability. The firm on 05-10-2022 approaches the respondent/State Bank of India (‘the Bank’ for short) re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top