SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 9195

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
SMT N PADMAVATHAMMA – Appellant
Versus
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER – Respondent


CAV ORDER

The petitioners, in both these cases, call in question a ‘No Objection Certificate’ issued on 30-11-2024 by the 1st respondent/Deputy Commissioner for setting up a petroleum unit in the place allotted.

2. Heard Sri H Kantharaj, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners and Sri Mohammed Jaffar Shah, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the respondent No.1 and Sri Rayappa Hadagali, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2, in both the cases and Sri A C Balaraj, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.3 in W.P.No.33877 of 2024 and for impleading applicant in W.P.No.1719 of 2025.

3. Facts, in brief, germane are as follows:-

The petitioner in W.P.No.33877 of 2024 is a holder of licence and running a petroleum unit in Sy.No.499, Khatha No.572 of Nayakanahatti Village, Challakere Taluk. The 2nd respondent/Mangalore Refinery and Petrochemicals Limited invites applications for the purpose of setting up of a petroleum unit in Sy. No. 212/5 measuring 25 guntas in Nayakanahatti Village, Nayakanahatti Hobli, Challakere Taluk. The 1st respondent/ Deputy Commissioner was called upon to inspect the property and give his no objection or nod for setting up o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top