SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 40979

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
SRI. KADEKAN PRAKASH KAMATH – Appellant
Versus
SRI. VITOBHA RUKMA BAI DEVARA BHANDARAM – Respondent


ORDER

The petitioners have assailed the correctness of the order dated 22.08.2023 passed by the First Addl. Civil Judge & JMFC at Mangaluru in O.S. No.617/2023 by which an application filed by them under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC was rejected.

2. The parties shall henceforth be referred to as they were arrayed before the trial court. The petitioners were the defendants while the respondents were the plaintiffs.

3. The suit in O.S. No.617/2023 was filed for the following reliefs.

(a) For a declaration that the Defendant No.1 and 2 are not lawfully appointed trustees of the 1st Plaintiff Bhandaram in accordance with the trust deed dated 08-10-1923 and for consequential prohibitory injunction restraining the Defendant No.1 and 2 from committing/executing any acts, deeds or things purporting to be the trustees of the

1st Plaintiff Bhandaram.

(b) For permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the 3rd Defendant from appointing any trustees to the 1st Plaintiff Bhandaram without the assent of the 2nd Plaintiff and or in violation of the terms of the trust deed dated 08-10-1923,purporting to be a hereditary trustee of the 1st Plaintiff Bhandaram.

4. The plaintiffs claimed that a private family tr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top