SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 11156

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
SRI R M MANJUNATH GOWDA – Appellant
Versus
DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT – Respondent


CAV ORDER

The petitioners – husband and wife, are at the doors of this Court calling in question an order of arrest, arrest memo, grounds of arrest and reasons so depicted to believe that the petitioners are in possession of proceeds of crime and consequently declare that the arrest and detention of the 1stpetitioner is illegal and void. As a consequence thereof, a declaration is also sought that the arrest and detention of the 1st petitioner is illegal and seek direction to release the 1stpetitioner from prison.

2. For the sake of convenience, unless otherwise referred to by their rank in the writ petition, the 1st petitioner would be referred to, as the petitioner, in this order.

3. Facts adumbrated are as follows:-

The petitioner, at the relevant point in time, was an elected Director of the District Central Co-operative Bank (‘DCC’ Bank) from 1997 and has also been the Chairman of the DCC Bank, Shivamogga, for over 19 years. The petitioner claims to be active in public field and has contested elections to the Thirthahalli assembly constituency in the previous elections and lost. On 17-07-2014, a crime in Crime No.325 of 2014 is registered against the employees of DCC Bank and inve

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top