Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
RAVI V HOSMANI J
SRI. NARAYANASWAMY – Appellant
Versus
SRI GANGAPPA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiff's claim over ancestral properties based on familial relations. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. arguments regarding legitimacy and entitlement to property. (Para 15 , 16 , 19) |
| 3. court's observations on rights of illegitimate children in inheritance. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 4. court's reasoning on the applicability of rights to ancestral properties. (Para 24 , 25) |
| 5. final ruling restoring trial court's decision on property rights. (Para 26) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
Challenging judgment and decree dated 05.08.2009 passed by Principal Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.), KGF, in R.A.no.16/2003, this appeal is filed.
2. Brief facts as stated are, appellant was plaintiff in OS no.134/1998 filed for partition and separate possession of properties bearing Sy.no.120/2, measuring 1 Acre 16 Guntas; Sy.no.144/5, measuring 26 Guntas; Sy.no.87, measuring 2 guntas; Sy.no.134 measuring 2 Acres 38 guntas, building and premises measuring ankanas, Mangalore tiled house, measuring 4 ankanas are situated at Karamangala village, Kasaba Hobli, Bangarpet Taluk (for short 'suit properties'); for permanent injunction, restraining defendants, etc. from interfering with peaceful possession and enjoyment of legitim
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
