Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
M.NAGAPRASANNA J
G.GAGAN – Appellant
Versus
IDFC FIRST BANK – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks defreezing of bank account due to suspicious transactions. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. court orders marking a lien on disputed amount while allowing account operations. (Para 4) |
ORAL ORDER
2. Heard Sri M H Sudhir Kumar Murolli, learned counsel appearing for petitioner and Sri Venkatanarayan, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2.
4. In the light of the admitted fact that disputed amount is Rs.23,000/-, I deem it appropriate to direct the 1st respondent Bank to mark a lien upon the said amount of Rs.23,000/- and permit normal operation of the account of the petitioner, as it was being operated prior to the date of freezement. After such marking of lien, the account of the petitioner shall be defrozen forthwith. Petition stands disposed accordingly.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
