Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
SURAJ GOVINDARAJ J
SRI. ANIL KUMAR ALIAS ANIL – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner sought bail in relation to offences under bns and pocso act. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. the court found custodial interrogation unnecessary based on the relationship. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. conditions for bail were outlined to ensure compliance. (Para 5) |
ORAL ORDER
“Allow this petition and order to release of the petition on Bail in Special Case No. 206/2025 arising out of Crime No.490/2024 registered by the Annapoorneshwari Nagara Police Station for offences alleged to be punishable under Sections 109 , 115(2), 118(1) and 118(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023, along with Sections 11(iv) and 12 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012, pending before the Hon’ble Fast Track Special Court-1, Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, in the ends of justice and equity.”
3. Notice was issued for the victim-respondent No.2. Despite service of notice, there has been no appearance on part of respondent.
5. In that view of the matter, I pass the following:
i. Criminal petition is allowed.
i. The petitioner shall execute his personal bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with surety for the likesum to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional court.
iii. T
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
