Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
JUSTICE, J
H MANJUNATH – Appellant
Versus
STATE BY POLICE INSPECTOR KLA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the case involves a bribe demand related to a property application. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. defense argues lack of evidence for demand and acceptance of bribe. (Para 4 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. the prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance of bribe. (Para 12 , 19) |
| 4. the conviction is overturned due to insufficient evidence. (Para 21) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
1. The appeal is filed challenging the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 28.02.2013 passed in Spl.C.C.No.28/2008 for the offence punishable under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act and sentenced the accused to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of six months with fine of Rs.200/- and rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year with fine of Rs.400/- for the offence punishable under Section 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act.
2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the respective parties.
3. The factual matrix of the case of the prosecution before the Trial Court that the complainant purchased a property bearing No.1831, EWS, Yalahanka Upanagara 3rd Stage and he has paid the necessary tax and also filed an application to the BBMP for change of katha but the said application
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
