SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 11598

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
RIYAZ AHAMED – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


ORAL ORDER

The petitioner is before this Court calling in question proceedings in C.C.No.39271 of 2024 registered for offences punishable under Sections 465 , 467, 468 , 471 , 420 read with Section 34 of the IPC .

2. Heard the learned counsel Sri.Rohan S., appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional State Public Prosecutor Sri.B.N.Jagadeesha, appearing for respondent No.1.

3. Facts in brief, germane, are as follows:

It is the case of the prosecution that, the petitioner claiming to be close to the powers that be in the Karnataka Public Service Commission and also the State, meets the complainant. The petitioner is said to have assured the complainant that he would get him the post of a Member in the Karnataka Public Service Commission for a price. Pursuant to the understanding between the two, a transaction of `1.8 crores happens between the two. The complainant did not become the Member of the Commission, but she seeks to register a complaint against the petitioner for having defrauded her, in luring her in the hope of becoming a Member of the Commission. The complaint becomes a crime in crime No.3/2024 for the offences under Sections 149, 420, 465, 467 , 471 and 468 of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top