SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 11601

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
MR. B RAJENDRA PRASAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA BY – Respondent


ORAL ORDER

Both these petitions arise out of solitary incident that takes place on 19.11.2023 and results in a case and a counter case. It is therefore, both these petitions are taken up together and considered by this common order.

2. Heard Shri Gururaja Shetty K., learned counsel appearing for the petitioner; Shri B.N. Jagadeesha, learned Additional Special Public Prosecutor appearing for respondent No.1 and Shri Parameshwar N. Hegde, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2.

3. Facts in brief germane are as follows:

The second respondent is the complainant in Crl.P.No.6400/2024. The petitioner in Crl.P.No.6400/2024 is the complainant in the companion petition. On 19.11.2023, a complaint comes to be registered alleging that the complainant in Crl.P.No.6400/2024, has been a member of the Karnataka State Lawn Tennis Association for over 20years and used to visit the gym every day from 6.30 p.m. to 7.30 p.m. It is alleged that on the said date, the complainant was speaking with the manager one Shri Rudresh. The petitioner is said to have taken a glass and thrown at the complainant and goes outside. The averment is that Shri Rudresh is also suspected to have been involved in the inc


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top