Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
SURAJ GOVINDARAJ J
RAVI @ RAITHA S/O KALAPPA@ KATALINGAPPA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. notice accepted for the respondent and representation confirmed. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. petitioner seeks bail after investigation completion; family supports marriage. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. conditions for bail set to ensure compliance and prevent witness tampering. (Para 6) |
ORAL ORDER
1. Learned HCGP accepts notice for respondent No.1.
2. Learned counsel Sri. B. Pramod undertakes to appear for respondent No.2.
3. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following relief:
" THEREFORE, it is respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail in case no. Spl(POSCO) no.12/2025 in Cr.No.230/2024 in Chikkajajur police under Sec 137(2), 64(2)(M), 65(1) under BNS Act, Sec 4, 6 & 18 under POSCO act- 2012, under Sec 75JJ Act and also under Sec 9 of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act -2006 which is pending on the file Special 2nd Addl. And Sessions Judge, Chithradurga. In by allowing this petition, in the interest of justice and equity."
4. Respondent No.2 has filed FIR in Cr.No.230/2024 alleging that her daughter was missing. Subsequently, investigation has been completed and chargesheet has been laid for offences under Sectio
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
