Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
JUSTICE, J
Madhukar G. Angur – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. arguments presented by the parties. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's analysis and observations. (Para 7 , 9) |
| 4. ratio decidendi regarding the nature of the complaint. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. final conclusion and order of the court. (Para 13) |
CAV ORDER
The petitioner is before this Court calling in question proceedings in C.C.No.3218 of 2021 pending before the I Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru, arising out of Crime No.60 of 2016 registered for offences punishable under Sections 465 and 468 of the IPC and Sections 66 and 66D of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’ for short).
2. Heard Sri Kiran S.Javali, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner, Sri B.N. Jagadeesha, learned Additional State Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1 and Sri M.S. Shyam Sundar, learned senior counsel appearing for respondent No.2.
3. Facts, in brief, germane are as follows:-
The issue in the lis revolves around domain name of Alliance University. In the year 2006, it appears, one Sudhir G. Angur registers a domain name ‘www.alliance.edu.in’ with ERNET India and is said to have regularly
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
