Back
2025 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 11886
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
M.G.S. KAMAL, J
SOMANAHALLI EDUCATION SOCIETY PARAMEDICAL COLLEGE – Appellant
Versus
DIRECTOR OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, BANGALORE MEDICAL COLLEGE – Respondent
WP 14167 / 2025
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI. SHIVARUDRA
For the Respondents: SRI.NEELAKANTAPPA K PUJAR
The court emphasized the importance of verifying application submissions and allowing students to take examinations upon rectification of technical issues.
Headnote:The petitioners, representing a paramedical college, sought to direct respondents to accept examination fees and issue hall tickets for supplementary exams. The court noted that the petitioners had uploaded applications but faced technical issues. The respondents agreed to verify the submissions and permit the petitioners to take the examinations. The Writ Petition is disposed of.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners faced technical issues in examination application submissions. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioners requested to take supplementary exams despite missing initial opportunities. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court directed verification of applications and permissions for examinations. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. writ petition was disposed of as per court's order. (Para 7) |
ORAL ORDER
Petitioner No.1 is running a Paramedical College and petitioners No.2, 3 and 4 are the students who are admitted to I year Diploma and their names have been reflected at Sl.No.11 (Operation Theatre and Anaesthesia Technology) and Sl.No.6 and 13 (Medical Laboratory Technology) respectively.
2. The case of the petitioners is that they had uploaded the applications to take-up supplementary examination, however, the respondent-Board had not issued hall tickets in respect of petitioners No.2, 3 and 4 apparently on account of certain technical snag in uploading their applications.
3. Learned counsel the petitioners submits that supplementary examinations have commenced from today. The petitioners had to attend two exams i.e., today and tomorrow. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that since they have missed the opportunity to take-up examination today, they may be permitted to take-up examination tomorrow.
4. Sri. Neelakantappa K. Pujar, learned High Court Government Pleader accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 and 2, submits that the petitioners in the first instance have not at all filed the applications, therefore there was no possibility of issuing the hall tickets to them. However, he fairly submits that if the applications of the petitioners have been submitted and required fees is paid, the respondents would look into the matter and permit them to take-up the examinations tomorrow.
5. Submission of the learned High Court Government Pleader is taken on record.
6. Respondents No.1 and 2 shall verify if the applications are filed and requisite application fees is paid. If so, the respondents shall permit petitioners No.2, 3 and 4 to take-up the examinations which is to be conducted tomorrow.
7. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of.
