KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
XXIII ASCJ & ACJM, ACJ
THE MANAGER – Appellant
Versus
MR RAHUL R M – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks to implead additional parties for assessing negligence. (Para 1 , 2 , 4) |
| 2. details of the accident and claims filed. (Para 5 , 6 , 9) |
| 3. arguments regarding necessity of additional parties. (Para 7 , 8) |
CAV ORDER
The petitioner/ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Limited who is common in both the petitions is at the doors of this Court calling in question a common order dated 01-07-2024 passed by the XXIII ASCJ & ACJM, Bengaluru, rejecting the application filed by the petitioner seeking to implead proposed respondents 3 to 6 as necessary parties to dispose of the claim petitions in M.V.C.Nos.6045 of 2022 and 6661 of 2022 on its merits, which concerns the same accident.
2. For the sake of convenience, facts obtaining in Writ Petition 24449 of 2024 are noticed.
3. Heard Sri S. Krishna Kishore, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Smt. M. Ambika, learned counsel appearing for the respondents in both the petitions.
4. Facts, in brief, germane are as follows:-
On 29-10-2022 when the 1st respondent one R.M. Rahul was driving a motorcycle bearing No.KA-04-EF-2074, along with one Arshid Ajishad, a pillion rider, a car bearing No.KA-50-MA-2520, t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.