SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 11491

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
XXIII ASCJ & ACJM, ACJ
THE MANAGER – Appellant
Versus
MR RAHUL R M – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Sri S. Krishna Kishore
For the Respondents: Smt. M. Ambika

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks to implead additional parties for assessing negligence. (Para 1 , 2 , 4)
2. details of the accident and claims filed. (Para 5 , 6 , 9)
3. arguments regarding necessity of additional parties. (Para 7 , 8)

CAV ORDER

The petitioner/ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Limited who is common in both the petitions is at the doors of this Court calling in question a common order dated 01-07-2024 passed by the XXIII ASCJ & ACJM, Bengaluru, rejecting the application filed by the petitioner seeking to implead proposed respondents 3 to 6 as necessary parties to dispose of the claim petitions in M.V.C.Nos.6045 of 2022 and 6661 of 2022 on its merits, which concerns the same accident.

2. For the sake of convenience, facts obtaining in Writ Petition 24449 of 2024 are noticed.

3. Heard Sri S. Krishna Kishore, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Smt. M. Ambika, learned counsel appearing for the respondents in both the petitions.

4. Facts, in brief, germane are as follows:-

On 29-10-2022 when the 1st respondent one R.M. Rahul was driving a motorcycle bearing No.KA-04-EF-2074, along with one Arshid Ajishad, a pillion rider, a car bearing No.KA-50-MA-2520, t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top