SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 11110

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
BIBI KHATEJA – Appellant
Versus
ALAGESHAN A – Respondent


ORAL JUDGMENT

(PER: HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL)

Challenging the dismissal of their claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (‘ MV Act ’ for short), the claimants in M.V.C.No.269/2021 on the file of X Additional Judge, Court of Small Causes & Member MACT, SCCH-16, Bengaluru have preferred this appeal.

2. Appellants were the claimants and respondent Nos.1 and 2 were respondent Nos.1 and 2 before the Tribunal. For the purpose of convenience, the parties are referred to henceforth according to their ranks before the Tribunal.

3. Claimant Nos.1 to 3 are the wife, mother and younger brother of the deceased Mohammed Umar. On 15.09.2020 at 10.45 a.m. when Mohammed Umar was riding his motorcycle bearing registration No.KA-06-HC-3135 near Bharath Petrol Bunk in Halenijagal Badavane, Tumkur- Bangalore NH Road, he met with road traffic accident and died.

4. Claimants filed M.V.C.No.269/2021 before the Tribunal contending that the deceased was doing Roti supplying business and earning Rs.50,000/- per month, they were dependent on the income of the deceased. The driver of the lorry bearing Registration No.TN-52-A-9907 drove the same in rash and negligent manner, hit the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top