SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 45739

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
DR NAVEEN KRISHNA TARUR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


ORAL ORDER

The present petition is by the petitioner/party-in-

person aggrieved by the order dated 31.05.2021 produced as Annexure-A1 by which the respondent No.2, Assistant Labour Commissioner has declined to entertain the petition filed by the petitioner seeking redressal of his grievance under the provisions of the Karnataka Shops and Commercial Establishment Act, 1981 on the premise that he has no jurisdiction to entertain the same.

2. The petitioner, party-in-person drawing the attention of this Court to the Notification dated 06.09.2021 produced at Annexure-B points out to the following:

"PÀæªÀÄ 39 gÀ°è ¥ÀæzÀvÀÛªÁzÀ C¢üPÁgÀªÀ£ÀÄß ZÀ¯Á¬Ä¹, F »AzÉ ºÉÆgÀr¸À¯ÁzÀ J¯Áè C¢ü¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß gÀzÀÄÝUÉÆ½¹ PÉÆÃµÀ×PÀzÀ 2£Éà CAPÀtzÀ°è £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¹gÀĪÀ PÀæ.¸ÀA.11 jAzÀ 21 gÀ ªÀgÉV£À C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À£ÀÄß "ªÉÄîä£À«

¥Áæ¢üPÁj" (Appellate Authority) UÀ¼À£ÁßV £ÉêÀÄPÀ ªÀiÁqÀ¯ÁVz"É.

3. He further points out tabular column found at page No.33 of the writ petition wherein at Sl.No.20 in respect of the establishments situated at Mangaluru to which the petitioner's case pertains, the Assistant Labour Commissioner has been designated as the Appellate Authority. Thus referring to the same, the petitioner/ party-in-per

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top