SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 38713

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
MUMTAZ BEGUM – Appellant
Versus
HALI MAKANAM – Respondent


JUDGMENT

This regular second appeal is filed by the appellant challenging the judgment and decree dated 26.07.2013, passed in R.A.No.34/2011 by the I Additional Senior Civil Judge and MACT-V, Chitradurga, setting aside the judgment and decree dated 20.09.2010, passed in O.S.No.68/2006 by the I Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) and JMFC, Chitradurga.

2. For the sake of convenience, parties are referred to as per their ranking before the trial Court. The appellant is the plaintiff and respondents are the defendants. Plaintiff filed a suit for declaration that, the plaintiff has got right to make use of the suit schedule property for running waste water from her house through the drain and carrying repairs for southern wall of her house and for permanent injunction and mandatory injunction.

3. The brief facts leading rise to filing of this appeal are as under:

It is the case of the plaintiff that, plaintiff is the owner in possession of suit schedule property and the plaintiff has purchased the suit schedule property under the registered sale deed dated 23.12.2004 from one Athaulla, son of Mohammed Khasim for valuable consideration of Rs.4,34,000/-. Since from the date of purchase,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top