SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 39018

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
SMT. GAYATHRAMMA H.M @ GAYATHRI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


ORDER

Heard Kum.Yuktha, advocate for Smt.Vandana P.L., learned counsel for the revision petitioner and Sri Vinay Mahadevaiah, learned High Court Government Pleader for respondent No.1.

2. Revision Petition is filed challenging the Order dated 20.09.2023 passed in S.C.No.12/2023 on the file of the II Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Shivamogga, rejecting the application filed by the accused/revision petitioner under Section 227 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

3. Facts in brief unfold as under:

Accused has been charge sheeted along with Dinesh Kumar for the offences punishable under Sections 302 and 498A r/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Column 17 of the Charge sheet would reveal that, one Sri Ranganath, S/o Eshwarappa, lodged a complaint alleging that his sister Manjula was married to accused No.1-Dinesh Kumar and she was living with accused No.1 and in the marital life, they have two daughters viz., Khushi and Manvitha. They were residing in a house at Priyanka Layout of Vidyanagara, Shivamogga.

4. It is also contended that accused No.1 was working in MESCOM and in his office, he developed illicit relationship with the present revision petitioner which was initially a love

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top