ORDER

Heard Sri S.Balakrishnan, learned counsel for the revision petitioners and Sri Channappa Erappa, learned High Court Government Pleader.

2. Revision petition is by the accused person who suffered an order of conviction in C.C No.315/2004 dated 22.03.2006 on the file of the Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC, Harihar, confirmed in Criminal Appeal Nos.55/2014 and 05/2014 dated 13.04.2016 on the file of the I Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Davanagere.

3. The learned Trial Magistrate passed an order of conviction for the offence punishable under Sections 143, 147, 448, 504, 323, 324, 326 r/w 149 of the Indian Penal Code in C.C.No.

315/2004 dated 22.03.2006 and sentenced as under:

“Heard regarding sentence.

The learned counsel for the accused has submitted that the accused persons are cousin brothers of the complainant and the 6th accused is a KSRTC bus conductor and so lenient view is to be taken. Taking into consideration the relationship between the complainant and the accused persons and also of the fact that the 6th accused is KSRTC bus conductor, if maximum sentence is imposed the life of the 6th accused will be spoiled. The 4th accused is aged about 60 years. So, the accused person