JUDGMENT

Though this appeal is admitted today, with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, matter is taken up for final disposal as the issue involved in this matter falls in a narrow compass.

2. There is no dispute of the fact that suit in O.S.No.217/2007 was filed by the plaintiff/respondent No.1 for relief of partition and separate possession in respect of two items of the suit schedule property namely, (1) land bearing Sy.No.417 an extent of 3 acres 7 guntas and (2) Janzer No.160, property bearing No.465 consisting of residential house measuring 45 X 261/ feet and vacant

2 space measuring 33 X 28 ft., situated at Kaiwara village, Kiawara Hobli, Chintamani Taluk, before the Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Chintamani (hereinafter referred to as 'Trial Court' for short). Preliminary decree was passed in the said suit on 10.07.2012. That seeking implementation of the said preliminary decree, plaintiff/respondent No.1 initiated final decree proceedings in FDP No.7/2013 in which FDP Court vide order dated 03.04.2014 has appointed Taluka Surveyor of Chintamani Taluk as a Court Commissioner to effect the division of item No.1 of suit schedule property being landed property as per preliminary decree passed in the said O.S.No.217/2007. Thereafter, by another order dated 09.06.2014 the FDP Court appointed an Advocate Commissioner to divide the item No.2 of the suit schedule property being the house property.

3. In furtherance thereof, Taluka Surveyor has submitted a report which reads as under;

WÀ£À £ÁåAiÀiÁ¢Ã±ÀgÀÄ ¹«¯ï £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄ »jAiÀıÉæÃt aAvÁªÀÄtÂ.

C¸À®ÄzÁzÀ ¸ÀASÉå:217/2007 J¥sïr¦-7/2023 ªÁ¢: ªÀÄAdÄ£ÁxÀ «gÀÄ ¥ÀæwªÁ¢UÀ¼ÀÄ : f. £ÁUÀgÁeï ªÀÄvÀÄÛ EvÀgÉ «µÀAiÀÄ : aAvÁªÀÄt vÁ®ÆèPÀÄ PÉʪÁgÀ ºÉÆç½, PÉʪÁgÀ UÁæªÀÄzÀ jÃ||¸À||£ÀA 417 gÀ 03.07 UÀÄAmÉ ¥ÀæzÉñÀzÀ 0.7 UÀÄAmÉAiÀÄ°ègÀĪÀ ªÀÄ£É zÀ£ÀzÀ PÉÆnÖUÉ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¥ÀA¥ÄÀ ºË¸ï£À°è ªÁ¢AiÀÄ zÁªÁA±ÀzÀ 1/4 ¨sÁUÀzÀ C¼ÀvÉ ªÀiÁrgÀĪÀ §UÉÎ.

G¯ÉèÃR: vÀªÀÄä £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ O.S.No.217/2007 FDP No.7/2013 PÉʪÁgÀ ºÉÆç½ aAvÁªÀÄt vÁ®ÆèPÀÄ PÉʪÁgÀ UÁæªÀÄzÀ j||¸À||£ÀA 417 gÀ «¹ÛtðzÀ°è 03.07 UÀÄAmÉ ¥ÀæzÉñÀzÀ 0.7 UÀÄAmÉ d«Ää£À°ègÀĪÀ ªÀÄ£É ªÀÄvÀÄÛ zÀ£ÀUÀ¼À PÆÉ nÖUÉ ªÄÀ vÄÀ Û ¥ÀA¥Àĺ˸ïUÀ¼À°è EgÀĪÀ ªÁ¢AiÀÄ 1/4 ¨sÁUÀzÀ C¼ÀvÉ ªÀiÁrgÀĪÀ §UÎÉ £À£ßÀ£ÄÀß £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ PÀ«ÄõÀ£Àgï DV £ÉëĹzÀÝ £Á£ÀÄ ªÁ¢ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¥æwÀ ªÁ¢UÀ½UÉ ªÀÄÄAavÀªÁV £ÉÆÃn¸ï ¤Ãr ¤UÀ¢¥Àr¹zÀ ¢£ÁAPÀzÀAzÀÄ C¼ÀvÉ PÉ®¸À ¤ªÀð»¸ÄÀ wÛzÝÀ ¥ÀæwªÁ¢U¼ÁzÀ f. £ÁUÀgÁeï ©£ï ¥Á¥ÀtÚ, «dAiÀĪÀÄä ©£ï PÀȵÉÚÃUËqÀ «±éÀ£ÁxÀ ©£ï ¯ÉÃmï ¥Á¥ÀtÚgÀªÀgÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ £ÉÆÃn¸À£ÀÄß eÁj ªÀiÁrPÉÆArgÀĪÀÅ¢®è ºÁUÀÆ C¼ÀvÉ ªÉÃ¼É ¸ÀºÀ ºÁdjgÀĪÀÅ¢®è. DzÀÝjAzÀ ¸ÀzÀj ¥ÀæwªÁ¢UÀ¼À 1/4 »¸ÉìAiÀÄ£ÀÄß C¼ÀvÉ ªiÀ ÁrgÄÀ ªÀÅ¢®è ªÁ¢AiÀÄ 1/4 »¸ÉìAiÀÄ£ÀÄß C¼ÀvÉ ªÀiÁrgÀÄvÉÛÃ£É CzÀgÀAvÉ £ÀPÉë vÀAiÀiÁj¹ £ÁåAiiÀ Á®AiÄÀPÉÌ ¸À°è¹PÉÆArgÀÄvÉÛãÉ.

vÀªÀÄä «±Áé¹, vÁ®ÆèPÀÄ ¸ÀªÉðAiÀÄgï/PÉÆÃmïð PÀ«ÄõÀ£Àgï vÁ®ÆèPÀÄ PÀZÉÃj aAvÁªÀÄtÂ.

A sketch is also furnished along with said report.

4. The advocate Commissioner who was appointed to divide the house property has also filed a report which reads as under;

WÀ£À £ÁåAiÀiÁ¢Ã±ÀgÀÄ

¹Ã¤AiÀÄgï ¹«¯ï £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ eÉ.JA.J¥sï.¹. £ÁåAiÀÄ®AiÀÄ, aAvÁªÀÄtÂ.

ªÀiÁ£ÀågÉÃ, «µÀAiÀÄ : aAvÁªÀÄt vÁ®ÆèPÀÄ PÉʪÁgÀ ºÉÆç½ PÉʪÁgÀ UÁæªÀÄzÀ jÃ||¸À||£ÀA 417 gÀ «¹ÛtðzÀ°è 1/4 ¨sÁUÀzÀPÉë ¥ÀæzÉñÀÌPÉ §gÀvÀPÀÌ «¹ÛtðªÀ£ÀÄß C¼ÀvÉ ªÀiÁqÀvÀPÀÌ §UÉÎ. G¯ÉèÃR: vÀªÀÄä £ÁåAiÀÄ®AiÀÄzÀ O.S.No.217/2007, FDP No.7/2013. ªÉÄîÌAqÀ «µÀAiÀÄPÉÌ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀAvÉ aAvÁªÀÄt vÁ®ÆèPÄÀ PÉʪÁgÀ ºÉÆç½ PÉʪÁgÀ UÁæªÀÄ j||¸À||£ÀA 417 gÀ «¹ÛtðzÀ°è 1/4 ¨sÁUÀzÀµÀÄÖ ¥ÀæzÉñÀªÀÅ ªÁ¢UÀ½UÉ ªÉÄîÌAqÀ G¯ÉèÃRzÀ°è £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¹gÀvÀPÀÌ O.S.No.217/2007 gÀAvÉ rQæ DVzÀÄÝ ¸ÀzÀj 1/4 ¨sÁUÀzÀµÀÄÖ ¥ÀæzÉñÀPÉÌ §gÀvÀPÀÌ «¹ÛtðªÀ£ÀÄß C¼ÀvÉ ªÀiÁqÀvÀPÀÌ §UÉÎ F.D.P.No.7/2013 gÀAvÉ £À£ÀߣÀÄß PÉÆÃmïð PÀ«ÄµÀ£Àgï DV £ÉëĹzÀ ªÉÄÃgÉUÉ F §UÉÎ £ÀªÀÄä ±ÁSÉAiÀÄ°ègÀvÀPÀÌ ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ ¸ÀªÉð ªÀÄÆ® zÁR¯ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥ÀqÉzÀÄ £ÁåAiÀÄ®AiÀÄzÀ rQæ DzÉñÀzÀAvÉ ¹¯ïÌjðAUïºË¸ï, ¥ÀA¥ÀÄ ºË¸ï ªÀÄvÀÄÛ PÁål¯ï ±ÉqïUÀ½gÀÄvÀÛªÉ. MlÄÖ 0-07 ¥ÀæzÉñÀªÀ£ÀÄß ©lÄÖ G½zÀ «¹ÛtðzÀ°è 1/4 (£Á¯ÁÌ£ÉMAzÀÄ) ¨sÁUÀPÉÌ §gÀĪÀ 0-30 ¥ÀæzÉñÀªÀ£ÀÄß C¼ÀvÉ ªÀiÁrgÀÄvÉÛ.

£ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ rQæ DzÉñÀzÀAvÉ ªÁ¢ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¥