ORAL ORDER

The grievance of the petitioners is non-consideration of the representations at Annexures-A to H. Petitioner Nos.1 and 3 are individuals and petitioner No.2 is Trust. The petitioners, concerning non-implementation of the guidelines issued by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Nipun Saxena and another vs. Union of India and others [(2019) 2 SCC 703], have made representations at Annexures- A to H before the respondent-authorities. Their further grievance is regarding non-implementation of the guidelines issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, Women Safety Division, dated 16.01.2019 at Annexure–M.

2. Heard Sri. Rajashekar S., learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri. S.H. Raghavendra, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 7, Sri. Sharanjith Shetty, learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos.8, 9, 11 to 16 and Sri Ashok N. Nayak, learned counsel for R10.

3. Sri. Rajashekar S., learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the photographs and names of the victims in the criminal offences are displayed through flex/banners in the public places. It is submitted that such display is in contravention of the guidelines issued b