Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
H.P. SANDESH, J
SRI RAMANA JNANA KENDRA – Appellant
Versus
SRI B. MAHALINGA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of the plaintiff's claim and the defendant's position. (Para 1 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. appellate court's findings on tenant status and possession. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 3. arguments regarding errors in appellate court's judgment. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 4. court's substantial questions of law regarding tenancy and applicability of rent act. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. analysis of the evidence and conclusion on the applicability of the rent act. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 6. final judgment restoring the trial court's decision. (Para 18) |
J U D G M E N T
2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant and the learned counsel appearing for respondent.
4. The factual matrix of the case of the plaintiff before the Trial Court while seeking the relief of possession that the plaintiff is a registered Trust undertaking social, cultural, religious and charitable activities. It is functioning based on the donations given by the general public. The Trust of the plaintiff is the owner of the suit schedule premises. The defendant approached the plaintiff as a tenant, but the plaintiff agreed to the indenture of undertaking by the defendant to pay security deposit of Rs.6,000/- and donation of Rs.300/-
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
