SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 45392

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
SIDDALINGAKUMAR D R – Appellant
Versus
C R YAMUNA – Respondent


ORDER

Aggrieved by the order passed in I.A.No.XI in C.Mis.No.311/2013 dated 19.02.2024 by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Tumakuru, the husband is before this Court.

2. The parties are referred to as husband and wife for the sake of convenience.

3. The petitioner/husband has filed an application in I.A.No.XI under Section 311 of Cr.P.C. to recall RW.1 to lead further chief-examination. The petitioner want to recall RW.1 to mark the photos of the previous work place of the respondent/wife i.e., Sukrutha Hospital, Batawadi, Tumakuru and also video proof of the wife currently working at Sri. Lakshmi Hospital, Sira Gate, Tumakuru and employer letters from Sukrutha Hospital, Batawadi, Tumakuru and Sri. Lakshmi hospital, Sira Gate, Tumakuru and hence, it is necessary to recall RW.1 and permit him to lead further chief-examination.

4. Objections are raised by the respondent/wife stating that the application is not maintainable and contended that the documents produced by the husband are created and concocted with photographic techniques and the same cannot be taken on record without the opinion of the expert. When the Court below has received the information that the wife is not working i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top