KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
SIDDALINGAKUMAR D R – Appellant
Versus
C R YAMUNA – Respondent
ORDER
Aggrieved by the order passed in I.A.No.XI in C.Mis.No.311/2013 dated 19.02.2024 by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Tumakuru, the husband is before this Court.
2. The parties are referred to as husband and wife for the sake of convenience.
3. The petitioner/husband has filed an application in I.A.No.XI under Section 311 of Cr.P.C. to recall RW.1 to lead further chief-examination. The petitioner want to recall RW.1 to mark the photos of the previous work place of the respondent/wife i.e., Sukrutha Hospital, Batawadi, Tumakuru and also video proof of the wife currently working at Sri. Lakshmi Hospital, Sira Gate, Tumakuru and employer letters from Sukrutha Hospital, Batawadi, Tumakuru and Sri. Lakshmi hospital, Sira Gate, Tumakuru and hence, it is necessary to recall RW.1 and permit him to lead further chief-examination.
4. Objections are raised by the respondent/wife stating that the application is not maintainable and contended that the documents produced by the husband are created and concocted with photographic techniques and the same cannot be taken on record without the opinion of the expert. When the Court below has received the information that the wife is not working i
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.