KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
SRI. H.S.ARUN KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
SR. T.N.CHANDRASHEKAR SETTY – Respondent
CAV JUDGMENT
This is defendants appeal directed against judgment and decree passed in OS.No.7270/2002 on the file of 30th Additional City Civil Judge, Bengaluru city dated
19.03.2010.
2. I refer to the parties as per their rankings before the trial Court.
3. It is the case of plaintiff that plaintiff is the landlord of the suit schedule property. During the year 1995, he had leased out one corner shop premises to defendants on monthly rent of Rs.2,000/- and defendant has to pay security deposit of Rs.1,00,000/-. Within two months, defendant Nos.1 and 2 again approached plaintiff to let out adjacent shop premises to the defendants on same terms and conditions. The plaintiff has agreed for the same and let out adjacent shop premises to defendants on the same terms. Defendants had to pay additional advance amount of Rs.1,00,000/- and total rent of both the shop was Rs.4,000/-p.m. The defendants did not pay additional advance amount of Rs.1,00,000/- while taking the second shop premises on lease. Hence lease agreement of the said shop was not executed.
4. It is further case of the plaintiff that on
24.06.1998, the plaintiff renewed lease of corner shop; since the defendants did not pay the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.