SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 44092

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
SRI. H.S.ARUN KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
SR. T.N.CHANDRASHEKAR SETTY – Respondent


CAV JUDGMENT

This is defendants appeal directed against judgment and decree passed in OS.No.7270/2002 on the file of 30th Additional City Civil Judge, Bengaluru city dated

19.03.2010.

2. I refer to the parties as per their rankings before the trial Court.

3. It is the case of plaintiff that plaintiff is the landlord of the suit schedule property. During the year 1995, he had leased out one corner shop premises to defendants on monthly rent of Rs.2,000/- and defendant has to pay security deposit of Rs.1,00,000/-. Within two months, defendant Nos.1 and 2 again approached plaintiff to let out adjacent shop premises to the defendants on same terms and conditions. The plaintiff has agreed for the same and let out adjacent shop premises to defendants on the same terms. Defendants had to pay additional advance amount of Rs.1,00,000/- and total rent of both the shop was Rs.4,000/-p.m. The defendants did not pay additional advance amount of Rs.1,00,000/- while taking the second shop premises on lease. Hence lease agreement of the said shop was not executed.

4. It is further case of the plaintiff that on

24.06.1998, the plaintiff renewed lease of corner shop; since the defendants did not pay the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top