KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
V SRISHANANDA J
SRI. C. ASHOK – Appellant
Versus
SRI. N. SRINIVASA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. final order reducing fine and maintaining conviction. (Para 50 , 51) |
ORDER
Heard Sri.K.N.Dayalu learned counsel for the revision petitioner and Sri.B.S.Prasad, learned counsel for the respondent.
2. Accused who suffered an order of conviction in C.C.No.3265/2016, for the offence punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act and ordered to pay Rs.2,00,10,000/- (Rupees Two Crores Ten Thousand Only) as against the cheque amount of Rs.1,00,00,000/- (Rupees One Crore Only) and out of the fine amount, a sum of Rs.2,00,00,000/- was ordered to be paid as compensation and Rs.10,000/- towards defraying expenses of the State. The said order of conviction and sentence was confirmed in Criminal Appeal No.71/2019, aggrieved by the same, the revision petitioner has preferred the present revision petition.
3. Facts in brief for the disposal of the revision petition are as under:
4. A criminal prosecution was launched by the respondent-complainant against the accused for the offence punishable under Section-138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act by filing a complaint with the Jurisdictional Magistrate under Section 200 of Cr.P.C. Contents of the complaint would reveal
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.