SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 37050

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
ADAM – Appellant
Versus
JAYAMALA P SHETTY – Respondent


ORDER

In this petition filed under Section 397 r/w 401 Cr.P.C, the accused has challenged his conviction and sentence for the offence punishable under Section 138 of N.I Act, which came to be confirmed by the Sessions Court, by dismissing the appeal filed by him.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to by the rank before the trial Court.

3. Complainant filed the complaint in question alleging that she and accused are known to each other since several years. On 17.08.2008, accused approached the complainant with a request to provide financial assistance in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- for business purpose. He agreed to repay the same within a short time. Accordingly, complainant lent a sum of Rs.1,00,000/-. However, accused failed to keep up his promise and went on postponing the repayment.

Ultimately on the repeated request and demand by the complainant, accused issued cheque dated 23.10.2008. At the request of the accused, complainant withheld presentation of cheque and ultimately after intimating the accused, she presented the cheque through her account on 06.03.2009. However, to her shock and surprise the cheque was returned dishonoured on the ground of "Insufficient

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top