Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
G BASAVARAJA, J
NITHESH MORAS @ ROSHAN RODRIGUES – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the accused was charged with theft and trespass based on a police complaint. (Para 3 , 4 , 6) |
| 2. arguments presented by both sides regarding the sufficiency of evidence. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 3. court's observations on procedural lapses and evidence evaluation. (Para 12 , 14 , 18) |
| 4. the court's reasoning leading to the conclusion of insufficient evidence. (Para 19) |
| 5. final order of acquittal based on the findings. (Para 20) |
ORAL ORDER
The revision petitioner has preferred this revision petition against the judgment of conviction and order on sentence passed by the III Additional Senior Civil Judge and J.M.F.C., Mangalore, D.K in C.C.No.29/2010 dated 02.06.2014, which is confirmed by the I Additional District and Sessions Judge, D.K., Mangalore in Crl.A.No.143/2014 dated 12.04.2017.
2. Parties to this revision petition are referred to as per their rank before the Trial Court.
3. The brief facts leading to this revision petition are that:
The Kavoor Police of Mangalore city have filed the charge sheet against the accused under Sections 457 and 380 of IPC . It is alleged by the prosecution that, on 24.07.2009, during early hours, about 1.30 a.m, at Kuloor Junction, Padukodi vi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
