Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Sri.Y.R.Sadasiva Reddy, J
DR. SHYAMALA REDDY – Appellant
Versus
THE MANAGER – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners challenge auction sale due to alleged procedural irregularities. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. respondent argues for adherence to statutory remedies under sarfaesi act. (Para 4) |
| 3. court emphasizes the importance of exhausting available remedies before seeking high court intervention. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. court directs petitioners to pursue remedies in the debt recovery tribunal. (Para 7 , 9) |
| 5. interim protection granted for petitioners to seek substantive remedy. (Para 8 , 10) |
ORAL ORDER
Heard Sri.Y.R.Sadasiva Reddy, learned Senior appearing on behalf of the petitioner.
2. The present petition is filed seeking issuance of mandamus directing the respondent to reverse the sale that is stated to have been conducted by the respondent and issuance of writ of mandamus is also sought to direct the respondent to consider the legal notice served to the respondent dated 08.09.2024. Further direction is sought for a direction against the respondent not to issue any sale certificate or sale deed.
3. Various contentions have been raised on behalf of the petitioners including that there are procedural irregularities, that valuation of the property prior to auction has not been made as pe
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
