Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
,
MR.AVINASH VITTAL SUTHAR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's request for bail is based on completed investigation and lack of prior criminal history. (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 6) |
| 2. arguments presented by both parties regarding the bail application. (Para 2 , 5) |
| 3. court grants bail under specified conditions. (Para 7) |
ORAL ORDER
Accused No.2 in Crime No.11/2025 registered by Dakshina Kannada CEN Crime Police Station, Dakshina Kannada, for the offences punishable under Sections 66(C) and 66(D) of Information Technology Act , 2008 and Sections 308(6) , 319(2) , 318(4) and 3(8) of BNS , 2023, is before this Court under Section 483 of BNS S, 2023, seeking regular bail.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
3. FIR in Crime No.11/2025 was registered by Dakshina Kannada CEN Crime Police Station, Dakshina Kannada, for the aforesaid offences against unknown persons based on the first information dated 03.03.2025 received from Radhakrishna Nayak S/o late Purushothama Nayak. During the course of investigation, petitioner herein was arrested on 10.03.2025 and subsequently, remanded to judicial custody. His bail application filed before the jurisdictional Sessions Court in Crl.Misc.No.5054/2025 was rejected on 05.04.2025
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
