SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 9874

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Judge, J
SRI B M MALLIKARJUNA @ FIGHTER RAVI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Senior counsel
For the Respondents: HCGP

Table of Content
1. petitioners seek quashing of remand and fir due to illegal arrest. (Para 2)
2. grounds of arrest were not communicated, violating rights. (Para 5)

ORAL ORDER

a) Call for records; Allow this Criminal petition and quash the order dated 24.01.2025 passed by the learned Magistrate remanding the petitioners along with FIR and complaint in Crime No.11/2025 registered by Respondent No.1 Police Station on the file of learned I Additional CMM Court, Bengaluru for the offences alleged punishable under Section 109 , 118(1), 3(5) of BNS, 2023 and Section 30 of Arms Act, 1959 , in the interest of justice and equity.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the respondents and perused the material on record.

The question of maintainability is kept open for the present.

2. Along with the petition, petitioners have filed I.A.3/2025 seeking their release by way of interim bail pending disposal of the present petition.

4. Issue notice to the 2nd respondent returnable by 17.02.2025.

(i) Pankaj Bansal vs. Union of India – (2024) 7 SCC 576 ;

(iii) Joginderkumar vs. State of U.P. – (1994) 3 SCR 661 ;

6. Per contra, learned HCGP for the 1st respondent – State wo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top