Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
S VISHWAJITH SHETTY, J
MR HAKIULLA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court examines the facts of the case regarding the bail application. (Para 1 , 3 , 6) |
| 2. arguments presented by both sides regarding the bail application. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's final decision to grant bail under specified conditions. (Para 7) |
ORAL ORDER
2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in all the other criminal cases registered against the petitioner, he has been enlarged on bail. In the present case, there is no test identification parade conducted and solely based on the confession statement of other accused persons, petitioner has been arraigned as an accused. Accordingly, prays to allow the petition.
6. FIR in the present case was registered against unknown persons based on the first information dated 02.09.2024 submitted by Krishna S/o. Venkatesh. In the first information, it is alleged that on 01.09.2024 when the first informant was traveling from Bengaluru Railway Station to Wadi Railway Station in Train bearing No.12627 - Karnataka Express with one Soheb S/o. Sabbir who was traveling to Kalaburagi from Bangalore, one person aged between 26 years entered the compartment in which first informant wa
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
