Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Sri. Subramanya R., J
RAKESH BABU GOVINDAREDDY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners seek to quash notifications regarding land acquisition. (Para 2) |
| 2. respondents acknowledge the issue is covered by previous judgments. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court discusses the lack of action on acquisition proceedings. (Para 5) |
ORAL ORDER
The petitioners are before this Court seeking the following prayers:
"a) Issue appropriate Writ, Order quashing the Notification under Sec. 3(1) of the Act dated 24.01.2003 bearing No. CI:196:SPQ 98 wherein the Petitioners' lands are declared as industrial area (Annexure - A);
b) Issue an appropriate Writ, Order quashing Notification under Sec. 1(3) of the Act dated 24.01.2003 bearing No.CI:196:SPQ 98 (Annexure-B) issued by Respondent Authorities insofar as the Petitioners' properties are concerned;
c) Issue an appropriate Writ, Order quashing the Preliminary Notification under Sec. 28(1) of the Act dated 29.01.2003 bearing No.CI:196: SPQ 98 (Annexure - C) issued by Respondent Authorities insofar as the Petitioners' properties are concerned.
d) Issue an appropriate Writ, Order declaring the acquisition proceedings as lapsed insofar as the Petitioners' properties are concerned.
e) Grant such other consequential reliefs as this Hon
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
