Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Venkatesh Naik T, J
H NAGARAJ S/O THIMMAPPA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the allegations and the context of the case. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments presented by both sides regarding bail. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's assessment of the evidence and eligibility for bail. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. legal standards for granting anticipatory bail. (Para 9) |
| 5. final decision and conditions imposed for bail. (Para 10) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T)
Heard Vidyashankar G. Dalwai, learned counsel for the appellants, Smt.Kirtilata R. Patil learned High Court Government Pleader for respondent No.1 – State and Sri Shiva Shirur learned counsel for respondent No.2.
2. This appeal is filed under Section 14A(2) of the Schedule Cast and Schedule Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (“SC & ST (PoA) Act” for short), praying to enlarge the appellants on anticipatory bail in Crime No.51/2025 of Munirabad Police Station registered for the offences punishable under Sections 189(2), 191(2), 118(1), 115(2), 133, 329(4), 74, 352, 351(2), 190 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (“BNS” for short) and Sections 3(1)(s), 3(1)(w), 3(1)(2)(va) of SC & ST (PoA) Amendment Act, 2015.
3. Brief facts of the prosecution case are as under:
On 06.03.2025,
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
