SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 10121

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
ROHAN NITHESH SALDANHA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petition filed under incorrect provision; liberty granted to file appropriate appeal. (Para 1)
2. court acknowledges submissions and issues final order for dismissal. (Para 2 , 3)

ORAL ORDER

Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that inadvertently, this criminal petition under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., has been filed instead of filing an appeal as provided under Section 14A of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 , ('SC&ST Act' for short). He submits that the present petition may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to the petitioner to prefer an appeal under Section 14A of SC&ST Act.

2. The aforesaid submission is placed on record.

3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as prayed for.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top