Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
K V Aravind, J
SRI. INDUDHAR S/O BASAPPA GOUDA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. incident details and initial proceedings of the trial. (Para 3 , 5 , 6 , 11) |
| 2. arguments regarding the reliability of evidence and potential biases. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. court's evaluation of evidence and confirmation of conviction. (Para 10 , 15) |
| 4. modification of sentence considering the accused's personal circumstances. (Para 19 , 20) |
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K V ARAVIND)
Heard Sri Jagadish Patil, learned counsel for the revision petitioner, and Sri T. Hanumareddy, learned Additional Government Advocate for the respondent.
2. The accused in C.C. No. 3118/2004 on the file of the II Additional JMFC, Sirsi, and the appellant in Crl.A. No.12/2014 on the file of the I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Uttara Kannada, Karwar, sitting at Sirsi, has preferred this revision petition.
3. It is the case of the prosecution that, on 18.09.2003, while the informant was returning home at about 10:00 p.m., near the shed of one Narendra Puttappa Naik, some liquid was thrown on her, due to which she experienced a burning sensation and shouted for help. Her parents, sisters, and other neighbours rushed to the spot, took her home, and noticed that her right chee
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
