SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 10251

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
M.I.ARUN, J
SYED ZAMEERUDDIN – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners:
For the Respondents:

Table of Content
1. application for conversion of land and statutory time limits. (Para 1 , 2)
2. rejection of application deemed impermissible under the act. (Para 3)
3. court's directive for compliance with statutory provisions. (Para 4)

ORAL ORDER

(PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN)

The petitioner is said to be the owner of agricultural land described in the schedule to the writ petition. He applied for conversion of the same for non-agricultural purpose (commercial). Said application has been made on 04.08.2023. Section 95(2) of the Karnataka Land Revenue (Second Amendment) Act, 2022 (for short, ‘the Act’), provides that in case the Deputy Commissioner fails to inform the applicant of his decision on the application made for conversion of the land from agricultural to non- agricultural purpose within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of said application, the permission applied for shall be deemed to have been granted.

2. Section 95(2) of the Karnataka Land Revenue (Second Amendment) Act, 2022 reads as under:

“"(2) If any occupant of a land assessed or held for the purpose of agriculture wishes to divert such land or any part thereof to any other purpose, he shall submit a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top