Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR, J
KUMAR.S. KARNING – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for document list and relevance in evidence. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. counterclaims and objections regarding the application. (Para 5 , 7) |
| 3. court's decision to allow the application and set aside the prior order. (Para 6 , 8 , 9) |
ORAL ORDER
This petition by the accused in Spl.C.C.No.9/2012 is directed against the impugned order dated 22.02.2025, whereby the application filed by the petitioner under Section 294 of Cr.P.C., for a direction to the respondent - prosecution to file the list of documents together with the purpose and relevance proposed to be marked / admitted in evidence by the respondent - prosecution, so as to enable the petitioner- accused to have his say in the matter, was rejected by the trial Court.
2. Heard learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent-State.
3. In addition to reiterating various contentions urged in the petition and referring to the material on record, learned Senior counsel for the petitioner invited my attention to the application filed by the petitioner under Section 294 Cr.P.C., dated 07.12.2024, in order to point out that though the simple request made in the application by the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
