SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 10284

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
, J
SMT. GANGAMMA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: [Names not provided]
For the Respondents: [Names not provided]

Table of Content
1. bail application for accused in murder case, investigation complete. (Para 1 , 3 , 4)
2. opposition to bail based on serious allegations; petitioners' relationship to main accused. (Para 2 , 6 , 7)
3. allegations against petitioners not substantiated; no prior criminal record. (Para 5 , 8 , 9)
4. bail granted with conditions; custody no longer necessary. (Para 10)

ORAL ORDER

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties.

4. The bail application filed by the petitioners before the Sessions Court in Crl.Misc.No.332/2025 was dismissed on 07.04.2025. Therefore, they are before this Court.

6. Per contra, learned HCGP has opposed the petition on the ground that serious allegations are found against the petitioners, who are the near relatives of accused No.1.

8. Perusal of the first information as well as the charge sheet, which is now filed as against 7 accused persons would go to show that, the allegation of assaulting deceased Netravathi and strangulating her neck with a piece of sarree and committing her murder on 17.03.2025 is only as against accused No.1. The offence punishable under Section 103(1) of BNS, 2023 and Section 6 of POCSO Act have not invoked against

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top