Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Justice Venkatesh Naik T, J
Accused No.3 – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court hears counsel for both sides. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. allegations of assault and threats against the appellant. (Para 4) |
| 3. arguments presented for and against bail application. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. court's evaluation of prima facie case and conditions for bail. (Para 8) |
| 5. conditions imposed for granting bail to the appellant. (Para 10) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T)
1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned High Court Government Pleader for respondent No.1-State.
2. Learned counsel for respondent No.2 is absent.
3. This appeal is filed by accused No.3 under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (for short, ‘the BNSS ’) praying to enlarge him on bail in Crime No.36/2025 of Navalgund Police Station registered for the offences punishable under Sections 189(2), 191(2), 115(2), 74, 352, 351(2), 190 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short, ‘the BNS’) and under Section s 3 (1)(r) , 3(1)(s) , 3(1)(w) , 3(2)(v-a) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short, ‘the SC/ST (POA) Act’).
4. The brief facts of the prosecution case is as under:
On 07.03.2023 there was an al
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
