Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Judge, J
SURESH N – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks to quash proceedings based on being a customer. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments presented by both sides regarding the nature of the petitioner's involvement. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court reviews the applicable laws regarding brothel management and customer prosecution. (Para 6) |
ORAL ORDER
In this petition, petitioner seeks for the following reliefs:
“Wherefore, the Petitioner humbly prays that this Hon’ble prays that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to set aside the order dated 23.02.2023, passed by the Learned III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Anekal, and quash the proceedings in S.C.No.5018/2023, for the offences punishable under Sections 3 , 4 , 5 and 7 of Immoral Traffic Prevention Act and under Section 370 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code , in the interest of justice.”
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned HCGP for respondent Nos.1 and 2 and perused the material on record.
3. A perusal of the material on record will indicate that the impugned proceedings for the offences punishable under Sections 3 , 4 , 5 and 7 of Immoral Traffic Prevention Act, 1956 and Section 370 read with Section 34 of IPC , the petitioner has been
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
