Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
J.M.KHAZI, J
SRI. BENKI CHIDANANDA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner challenges conviction for cheque fraud. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. trial court acquitted some charges but convicted for others. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. defence claims cheque was from a joint account. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. evidence supports prosecution's case against accused. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 5. court affirms conviction, finds no error in lower courts. (Para 20 , 21) |
CAV ORDER
In this petition filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of Cr.P.C petitioner who is accused No.1 has challenged his conviction and sentence imposed by the trial Court for the offence punishable under Sections 420 , 467 , 471 of IPC which came to be confirmed by the Sessions Court by dismissing the appeal filed by him.
2. For the sake of convenience, parties are referred to by their ranks before the trial Court.
3. Respondent No.2 - Defacto complainant K Raghu filed a complaint under Section 200 of Cr.P.C, alleging that on 07.05.2012, accused No.1 borrowed hand loan of ₹20,000/- with a promise to repay the same within one month. He issued a cheque dated 07.06.2012 towards repayment of the same. When complainant present it for encashment, it was returned with endorsement "ther
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
