SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 10512

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
, J
SRI. RAJU. S – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners:
For the Respondents: HCGP

Table of Content
1. arguments presented by both petitioner and respondent. (Para 2 , 4)
2. petitioner seeks the release of seized cash. (Para 3)
3. court's observations on the necessity of timely release of seized items. (Para 5 , 6)
4. court's reasoning for quashing the magistrate's order. (Para 7)
5. final order allowing the petition and setting conditions for release. (Para 8)

ORAL ORDER

In this petition, petitioner seeks the following reliefs:

“(a) Issue a writ of certiorari or other appropriate writ or order seeking to set aside the order dated 02.01.2024 passed by learned II ACJM, Bengaluru, in C.C.No.8477/2023 vide Annexure – C and to release the amount of Rs.5,54,400/- (Rupees five lakhs fifty four thousand four hundred only) in favour of the petitioner, which was seized under PF No.42/2023 dated 26.03.2023.

(b) Pass such other order/s as this Hon’ble Court deem fit under the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice.”

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned HCGP for the respondents and perused the material on record.

3. A perusal of the material on record will indicate that pursuant to the complaint dated 26.03.2023 lodged by the respondent – p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top