Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
R. NATARAJ, RAJESH RAI K, JJ
SRI. ARUN KUMAR S/O. LATE R.NANJUNDA RAO – Appellant
Versus
SRI. R.N.JAGANNATHA RAO S/O. LATE R.NANJUNDA RAO, SMT. VIMALA W/O. LATE SRI. R.MANOHAR, SMT. BHUVANESHWARI W/O. SRI. G.UMA MAHESHWAR RAO, SMT. R.SURYA KUMARI W/O. A.MOHAN – Respondent
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.NATARAJ)
Learned counsel for appellant submits that the parties have reported a compromise. However, he is not sure as to whether such a compromise is reported in the final decree proceedings or outside the court.
In view of the above submission, the appeal has become infructuous. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous.
However, the parties are at liberty to seek restoration of this appeal if the parties have not settled the dispute.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
