SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 12388

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
M.I.ARUN, J
P.S. RAJESH BABU – Appellant
Versus
THE NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITIES OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI S.V. PRAKASH
For the Respondents: SRI SHOBITH N. SHETTY, SMT. SUKANYA BALIGA, SRI S. MAHESH

Table of Content
1. petitioners claim lack of due process in property demolition. (Para 1)
2. state's obligation to follow the law is acknowledged. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
3. court directs lawful action regarding property. (Para 5)

ORAL ORDER

2. The learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for respondent Nos.2 to 7 and 9 upon instructions submits that whatever action that has to be taken will be taken only in accordance with law.

4. One cannot presume that the State Authorities are going to act arbitrarily and demolish the properties of the petitioners.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top