Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
J.M.KHAZI, J
SMT NAGAMANI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners seek to quash criminal proceedings based on allegations of harassment and dowry demands. (Para 1 , 3 , 5 , 6 , 8) |
| 2. court observes that the timing of the complaint suggests potential abuse of process. (Para 7) |
| 3. court quashes proceedings against petitioners, citing abuse of the court process. (Para 9) |
ORAL ORDER
2. For the sake of convenience, parties are referred to by their ranks before the trial Court.
4. It is contended by accused Nos.2 to 4 that after the marriage complainant stayed in the matrimonial home from 2015 to 2021. During September 2021, on the date of Bhimana Amavasya, complainant abruptly left the matrimonial home without attending the Pooja. She started attending to her work from her parental home and did not return to the matrimonial home. Despite request made by accused No.1, on 21.11.2021, complainant along with her parents came and took away all her belongings, including jewellery, clothes, original educational records, and her personal belongings from the matrimonial home. When accused No.1 tried to meet her, she evaded and neglected him.
5. In support of the petition, accused Nos.2 to 4 have contended that the filing of the charge
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
