Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
,
Chetan @ Chetan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Chandrika – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. parties amicably settled the dispute and sought to quash the fir. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. court quashed the fir based on mutual agreement. (Para 4) |
ORAL ORDER
In this petition, petitioner seeks for the following relief:
“Wherefore, the petitioner prays that this Hon’ble Court be pleased to quash the FIR and complaint in Crime No.47/2025 of Bengaluru District Women PS, for the alleged offences Punishable under section 351(2) and 64 of BNS , 2023 pending before the Addl. Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC Court at Doddaballapura, Bengaluru Rural District, in the interest of justice.”
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner – accused and learned counsel for 2nd respondent – complainant have filed an application along with Joint Affidavit dated 12.06.2025 duly signed by the petitioner, 2nd respondent and their respective counsel and the same is taken on record.
3. Petitioner – accused and respondent No.2 – complainant and their respective counsel are physically present before the Court and they admit the contents of the aforesaid application and Joint Affidavit, which reads as under:-
“APPLICATION FILED UNDER SECTION 320 R/W 482 OF THE Code of Criminal Procedure
That for the reasons st
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
