SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 30617

- 1 -

NC: 2023:KHC:40294-DB

CRL.CCC No. 11 of 2023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2023

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE MR PRASANNA B. VARALE, CHIEF JUSTICE

AND

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT

CRIMINAL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 11 OF 2023

BETWEEN:

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,

REPRESENTED BY THE REGISTRAR GENERAL,

BENGALURU-560 001.

…COMPLAINANT

(BY SRI. ANOOP KUMAR., HCGP)

AND:

1.

SMT. MARY CYRIAC,

W/O K K CHACHO,

AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS,

R/AT NO.87/1, BANDAPPA LAYOUT,

MES ROAD, GOKUL,

BENGALURU-560 054.

2.

SRI. SHRIPAD V SHASTRI,

ADVOCATE,

ENROLLMENT NO.KAR 302/1991,

K.G. NAGAR MAIN ROAD, CHAMARAJPET,

BENGALURU-560 019.

…ACCUSED

(BY SRI. SANDESH T B.,ADVOCATE FOR A1;

SRI.JAYAKUMAR S PATIL., SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR A2)

THIS CRL.CCC FILED UNDER SECTION 15 OF THE

CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 R/W ARTICLE 215 OF THE

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA BY THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

Digitally signed

by SHARADA

VANI B

Location: HIGH

COURT OF

KARNATAKA

- 2 -

NC: 2023:KHC:40294-DB

CRL.CCC No. 11 of 2023

PRAYING TO INITIATE (SUO-MOTU) CRIMINAL CONTEMPT OF

COURT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST (1) SMT. MARY CYRIAC, AGED

ABOUT 72 YEARS, W/O K.K. CHACHO, R/AT NO.87/1,

BANDAPPA LAYOUT, MES ROAD, GOKUL, BENGALURU-560054

AND (2) SRI. SHRIPAD V. SHASTRI, ADVOCATE, K.G. NAGAR

MAIN ROAD, CHAMARAJPET, BENGLAURU-560 019, UNDER THE

CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 AND TO PUNISH THEM IN

ACCORDANCE WITH LAW.

THIS CRL.CCC COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING,

THIS DAY, CHIEF JUSTICE MADE THE FOLLOWING:

Learned

counsel

appearing

for

the

accused-

respondents invited our attention to the statement of facts

filed in this court on 9.11.2023. Learned Sr. Counsel

submits that at the outset itself, accused-respondents

tendered their unconditional apology and submit that a

bonafide mistake occurred at their hands. Learned counsel

further submits that the accused persons also have

showed their bonafide by straight way agreeing for the

allowing of Review Petition which was filed at a very

belated stage i.e., with a long delay of twelve years and

that the Review Petition was allowed. The counsel then

submits that the matter can be looked with some

humanitarian angle for the reason that the claimants who

- 3 -

were in their advanced age had lost their son in a

vehicular accident. Our scriptures say “putra shokam

nirantaram” literally meaning that bereaved parents suffer

eternally.

Considering all these facts, we are of the

considered opinion that the apology tendered by these two

accused persons is a bonafide and the same needs to be

accepted with a warning that the accused-respondents

shall not give scope for the incidents of the kind or for

their recurrence, in future.

With these observations, this complaint of contempt

is disposed off. Notice is discharged.

Sd/-

CHIEF JUSTICE

Sd/-

JUDGE

cbc

List No.: 2 Sl No.: 1

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top